In recent news, the convergence of artificial intelligence and corporate decision-making has taken an intriguing turn as significant companies increasingly utilize AI for legal counsel. A notable illustration of this phenomenon is the case of Krafton, the publisher behind the highly anticipated game Subnautica 2. The firm has found itself caught up in legal confrontations with former executives and developers, leading to a complicated legal struggle.
Krafton, recognized for its successful gaming initiatives, is presently facing lawsuits from three former leads of Subnautica 2. These former leads have charged the company with neglecting their responsibilities, prompting Krafton to initiate a countersuit. The essence of the conflict centers on the postponed release of Subnautica 2, a choice that caused Unknown Worlds, the game’s developer, to forfeit a considerable $250 million bonus.
In a surprising development, Krafton reportedly sought the assistance of ChatGPT, a well-known AI language model, for advice on managing these legal obstacles. This action illustrates the increasing dependence on AI tools for strategic decision-making within the corporate sphere. The employment of AI in such critical situations raises inquiries about the function of technology in shaping legal approaches and the possible repercussions for the future of corporate governance.
The circumstances highlight the shifting landscape of business operations, where AI is not merely a tool for innovation but also a resource for addressing intricate legal and ethical challenges. As companies like Krafton investigate the potential of AI in legal contexts, the broader ramifications for the industry and the legal field remain to be fully comprehended. This case acts as a reminder of the transformative effect of AI on conventional business practices and the necessity for careful evaluation of its applications in sensitive domains such as legal matters.